| We would advise Dr M to critically
reflect on his request, and try to look at it from the perspective
of a referee for a funding body.
1. Clearly state the problem the gave rise to the research
work: (WHAT):
State the decision difficulties in Family Planning.
Outline the service pressures and opportunities as they relate
to the proposed decision support system.
2. Set the scientific background: (WHY):
State how does previous AI R&D relate to the clinical
problem, with critical review of relevant literature.
Outline the proposed engineering path.
Set an evaluative framework for the work.
3. Project plan and impact: (HOW):
Outline the cost and time map of the work.
Speculate on clinical impacts of a range of outcomes.
Even short initial approaches for research funding should
clearly present a WHAT, WHY and HOW. I think that Dr M would
have been better to send us a link to the article that he
mentions but does not cite.
|